Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the VG-120 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-120 was released 23 months later than the CX1 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the VG-120 scores vs the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-120 & Ricoh CX1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh CX1
| VG-120 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus VG-120
| CX1 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX1
| VG-120 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-120 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the VG-120 and the CX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-120 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The visual below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-120 and CX1.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VG-120 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern VG-120 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) | 180 gr (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $190 | $299 |