Clicky

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Olympus VG-120 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus VG-120
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2011
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Released February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the VG-120 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The VG-120 was released 23 months later than the CX1 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the VG-120 scores vs the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh CX1

 VG-120 CX1 
ReleasedJanuary 2011February 2009Fresher by 23 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus VG-120

 CX1 VG-120 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX1

 VG-120 CX1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-120 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the VG-120 and the CX1.

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-120 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The visual below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-120 and CX1.

Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VG-120 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern VG-120 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-120 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh CX1 Portrait photography advice
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
25
manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-120 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Street photography camera
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-120 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh CX1 Sports photography highlights
26
decent megapixels (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (160 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-120 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX1 Travel photography factors
62
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
not so great battery power (160 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
59
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VG-120
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX1
36
pretty wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3")
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
not so great battery power (160 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
42
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-120 Vlogging information
Ricoh CX1 Vlogging information
28
pretty wide (26mm)
offers face detect autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone port
28
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus VG-120Ricoh CX1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VG-120 Ricoh CX1
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-01-06 2009-02-19
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-200mm (7.1x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing distance 7cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.40 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 120 gr (0.26 pounds) 180 gr (0.40 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 160 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-70B DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $190 $299