Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX3
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX3, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the VG-120 (14MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VG-120 was manufactured 7 months later than the CX3 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the VG-120 scores vs the CX3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-120 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh CX3
| VG-120 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus VG-120
| CX3 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX3
| VG-120 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-120 provides physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the VG-120 and the CX3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-120 and CX3 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-120 and CX3.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus VG-120 to deliver more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The newer VG-120 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $190 | $329 |