Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the VG-120 (14MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VG-120 was revealed 5 months after the CX4 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the VG-120 matches up versus the CX4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX4. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-120 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh CX4
| VG-120 | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus VG-120
| CX4 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh CX4
| VG-120 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | August 2010 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-120 features physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the VG-120 compared to the CX4.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-120 and CX4 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-120 and CX4.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-120 to offer extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120g (0.26 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $190 | $211 |