Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus VG-120 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very close but the VG-120 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-120 was launched 15 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the VG-120 scores versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-120 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| VG-120 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 | November 2009 | More modern by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus VG-120
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| VG-120 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-120 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-120 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the VG-120 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the VG-120 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 96 and 77 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-120 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Plainly, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VG-120 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus VG-120 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger VG-120 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2009-11-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 pounds) | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | 320 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $190 | $566 |