Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VG-120 was announced 4 years before the WG-4 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the VG-120 grades versus the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-120 & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh WG-4
| VG-120 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus VG-120
| WG-4 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh WG-4
| VG-120 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VG-120 provides outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the VG-120 versus the WG-4.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VG-120 and WG-4 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-120 and WG-4.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to result in extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older VG-120 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120g (0.26 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $190 | $330 |