Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very close and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-120 was introduced 4 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the VG-120 scores against the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-120 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| VG-120 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus VG-120
| WG-4 GPS | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| VG-120 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-120 comes with external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the VG-120 versus the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-120 and WG-4 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-120 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide you with more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The older VG-120 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 photos | 240 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $190 | $210 |