Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus VG-120 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The VG-120 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the VG-120 grades vs the WG-5 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-120 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
VG-120 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus VG-120
WG-5 GPS | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 49 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
VG-120 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus VG-120 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-120 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the VG-120 versus the WG-5 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce76e/ce76e65e953c76fcb2c6689286d09dca305e3f45" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-120 and WG-5 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b16a9/b16a96c6bff854da7bea73ec2c018d2e7932565a" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The visual below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-120 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to provide extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older VG-120 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a99db/a99db59c7df4c2b652a784d90038d5a4d092416f" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4acc7/4acc7d54ef994cf13db4b140b391b50851c741ea" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 120g (0.26 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photos | 240 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $190 | $500 |