Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus VG-120 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VG-120 was revealed 4 years prior to the WG-M1 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the VG-120 matches up vs the WG-M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-120 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| VG-120 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus VG-120
| WG-M1 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 44 months |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh WG-M1
| VG-120 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-120 has external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-120 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the VG-120 and the WG-M1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-120 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-120 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution and you should expect similar quality of files although you should factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged VG-120 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120g (0.26 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $190 | $2,000 |