Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47851/478511a8a927c87f7bc64622b7ea2ec44bf09c1b" alt="Samsung HZ15W front Samsung HZ15W front"
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The VG-120 was released 23 months after the HZ15W which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the VG-120 grades vs the HZ15W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-120 and Samsung HZ15W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-120 Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Samsung HZ15W
VG-120 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus VG-120
HZ15W | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Samsung HZ15W
VG-120 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-120 provides outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung HZ15W has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the VG-120 compared to the HZ15W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55b1e/55b1ec7eae50dfa3f8cf1ddc95caa8a1e267b31f" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-120 and HZ15W is 96 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/212bf/212bfdb60a7ba0ca267a9b51952919c6153a2c4d" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The pic below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-120 and HZ15W.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus VG-120 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer VG-120 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/154af/154afa07920be11932eb43793a2a0b4bd3de884e" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1ef5/a1ef5626aa32727bae9c386beb2243b38c25ce3f" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Olympus VG-120 | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VG-120 | Samsung HZ15W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB550 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 120 gr (0.26 lbs) | 249 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $190 | $330 |