Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL225
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST550
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Olympus VG-120 versus Samsung TL225, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-120 was manufactured 18 months after the TL225 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the VG-120 matches up against the TL225 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-120 & Samsung TL225. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Samsung TL225
| VG-120 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | August 2009 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Olympus VG-120
| TL225 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1152k | 230k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Samsung TL225
| VG-120 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-120 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-120 versus Samsung TL225 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the VG-120 against the TL225.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-120 and TL225 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-120 and TL225.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus VG-120 to resolve extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer VG-120 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VG-120 | Samsung TL225 |
| Other name | - | ST550 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120g (0.26 pounds) | 187g (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $190 | $488 |