Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL240
Portability
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
Olympus VG-120
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is ST5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus VG-120 versus Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VG-120 was released 13 months after the TL240 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the VG-120 grades against the TL240 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-120 & Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Samsung TL240
| VG-120 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Olympus VG-120
| TL240 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Samsung TL240
| VG-120 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-120 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-120 versus Samsung TL240 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the VG-120 vs the TL240.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-120 and TL240 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-120 and TL240.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs though you need to take the age of the products into consideration. The younger VG-120 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus VG-120 Portrait photography information
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography information
megapixel count decent (14MP)
supports face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus VG-120 Street photography highlights
Samsung TL240 Street photography highlights
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch focus
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (160 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus VG-120 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Sports photography camera
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery power (160 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus VG-120 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Travel photography camera
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low battery power (160 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
includes touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (160 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus VG-120 Landscape photography factors
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography factors
really wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
low battery power (160 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
lovely big screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-120 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung TL240 as a Vlogging camera
really wide (26mm)
supports face detect focusing
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (160 grams)
Photography Glossary
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-120 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also Known as | - | ST5000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $190 | $171 |