Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung WB210
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus VG-120 and Samsung WB210, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-120 was launched 6 months earlier than the WB210 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the VG-120 scores vs the WB210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-120 and Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-120 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Samsung WB210
| VG-120 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 1k | Sharper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Olympus VG-120
| WB210 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Samsung WB210
| VG-120 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | July 2011 | Similar generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-120 features exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-120 and Samsung WB210 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the VG-120 and the WB210.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-120 and WB210 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-120 and WB210.
Plainly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you should expect similar quality of photographs though you should take the production date of the products into consideration.
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-120 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lb) | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $190 | $279 |