Olympus VG-120 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus VG-120 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Older Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-120 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus VG-120 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is very well matched but the VG-120 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VG-120 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the DP3 Merrill making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the VG-120 scores versus the DP3 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-120 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-120 & Sigma DP3 Merrill. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
| VG-120 | DP3 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Olympus VG-120
| DP3 Merrill | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
| VG-120 | DP3 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus VG-120 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-120 features external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP3 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-120 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the VG-120 and the DP3 Merrill.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-120 and DP3 Merrill is 96 and 83 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The photograph here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-120 and DP3 Merrill.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VG-120 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will give you extra detail due to its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older VG-120 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-120 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus VG-120 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus VG-120 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
| Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120 gr (0.26 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $190 | $1,353 |