Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfb5/1cfb573f9a199713750718c4e753341b4a66f33c" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front"
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched January 2008
- Successor is Sony A330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the VG-120 (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the VG-120 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The VG-120 was manufactured 2 years after the A300 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the VG-120 matches up vs the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-120 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VG-120 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Sony A300
VG-120 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2008 | More modern by 36 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus VG-120
A300 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Sony A300
VG-120 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-120 has physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the VG-120 compared to the A300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aef20/aef2093c8cc53814e748cdde0ec0f98defc736ee" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 size comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-120 and A300 is 96 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8d6e/c8d6ea1ea087aab6a84d1a9afd2aea11a60c376d" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-120 and A300.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VG-120 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus VG-120 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger VG-120 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80264/8026493b196c9361b5450ee8b4a6b9eed9c5aaeb" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6122f/6122f133930a3ce17a0085607f5ace27c2808db2" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus VG-120 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VG-120 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2008-01-30 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) | 632 gr (1.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $190 | $0 |