Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A390
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced July 2010
- Replaced the Sony A380
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A390 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus VG-120 and Sony A390, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the A390 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the VG-120 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VG-120 was launched 6 months after the A390 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the VG-120 matches up versus the A390 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-120 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Sony A390
| VG-120 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus VG-120
| A390 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Sony A390
| VG-120 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | July 2010 | Similar age |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-120 has physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-120 and Sony A390 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the VG-120 vs the A390.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-120 and A390 is 96 and 66 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-120 and A390.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical resolution but different sensor dimensions. The VG-120 comes with the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder.
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VG-120 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus VG-120 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120g (0.26 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 shots | 230 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $190 | $500 |