Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus VG-145 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly close but the VG-145 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The VG-145 was announced 17 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the VG-145 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-145 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VG-145 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus VG-145
XZ-2 iHS | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VG-145 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-145 enjoys outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-145 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the VG-145 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d987/8d9873ad8cc0c75a2fe41882dd1888f0706d3c42" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-145 and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89d85/89d850ad563c793b9c69c51474f3d50848e775ce" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-145 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VG-145 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Olympus VG-145 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged VG-145 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85d29/85d2973ac4de0d97f8e567a08f3dd518ee8bb583" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b92d8/b92d88a5fa5031184ee9fabb436fa2427d15657c" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus VG-145 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 120g (0.26 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 shots | 340 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $450 |