Olympus VG-145 vs Panasonic FZ2500
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus VG-145 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus VG-145 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus VG-145 versus Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the VG-145 (14MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the VG-145 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-145 was brought out 6 years prior to the FZ2500 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the VG-145 grades versus the FZ2500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VG-145 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-145 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Panasonic FZ2500
VG-145 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus VG-145
FZ2500 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | July 2011 | More modern by 62 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Panasonic FZ2500
VG-145 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus VG-145 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-145 provides exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has dimensions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VG-145 versus Panasonic FZ2500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the VG-145 and the FZ2500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-145 and FZ2500 is 96 and 53 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-145 and FZ2500.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VG-145 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will offer extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VG-145 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus VG-145 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-145 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus VG-145 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-07-27 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lbs) | 915 grams (2.02 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photos | 350 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $998 |