Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Released August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus VG-145 versus Pentax Q-S1, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is very similar but the VG-145 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The VG-145 was released 4 years earlier than the Q-S1 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the VG-145 scores against the Q-S1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-145 & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Pentax Q-S1
VG-145 | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus VG-145
Q-S1 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Pentax Q-S1
VG-145 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-145 comes with outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VG-145 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the VG-145 and the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32d65/32d65177e9e24770e7b7c9e4bf799f9ac374fb28" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-145 and Q-S1 is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee4c0/ee4c0df15e361bc19488caf031f3c83437d937dd" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-145 and Q-S1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VG-145 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus VG-145 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older VG-145 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4071/b4071287c6d84f41c0ae2a092e212caa31292fcd" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ee4b/1ee4bd2a892fef2630403d68a896163d4091f53a" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus VG-145 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 120 grams (0.26 pounds) | 203 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 shots | 250 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $0 | $250 |