Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2013
- Old Model is Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the Q7 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the VG-145 (1/2.3") and Q7 (1/1.7") boast different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The VG-145 was revealed 24 months prior to the Q7 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the VG-145 matches up versus the Q7 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-145 & Pentax Q7. The full galleries are available at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Pentax Q7
VG-145 | Q7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus VG-145
Q7 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 24 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Pentax Q7
VG-145 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-145 offers external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Pentax Q7 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the VG-145 versus the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7b8f/e7b8f1e3f269a82b2d60c3495a8ded719fb89b84" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-145 and Q7 is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99cd5/99cd5d435aa0c67e4cde45740c6abbd7583fc556" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-145 and Q7.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VG-145 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus VG-145 will provide greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged VG-145 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56630/566309ec2a886084af17d46509af987513c8db8c" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03797/037975d90170cffb33af8240e34776f7fd05c81a" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus VG-145 | Pentax Q7 |
Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-07-27 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 120g (0.26 pounds) | 200g (0.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photographs | 250 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $480 |