Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax WG-3
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus VG-145 versus Pentax WG-3, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the WG-3 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VG-145 was manufactured 24 months before the WG-3 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the VG-145 matches up against the WG-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-145 and Pentax WG-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-145 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Pentax WG-3
| VG-145 | WG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus VG-145
| WG-3 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Pentax WG-3
| VG-145 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-145 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-145 versus Pentax WG-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the VG-145 compared to the WG-3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-145 and WG-3 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-145 and WG-3.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Pentax WG-3 to offer greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older VG-145 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VG-145 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Olympus VG-145 | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus VG-145 | Pentax WG-3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-07-27 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 photos | 240 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $300 |