Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus VG-145 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly well matched but the VG-145 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.

The VG-145 was released 21 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summation of how the VG-145 matches up vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-145 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-145 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VG-145 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus VG-145
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VG-145 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-145 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-145 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the VG-145 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-145 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 96 and 77 respectively.

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-145 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VG-145 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus VG-145 will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher VG-145 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-145 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lbs) | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 shots | 320 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $566 |