Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung DV150F
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung DV150F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the DV150F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-145 was introduced 17 months before the DV150F which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung DV150F being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the VG-145 scores versus the DV150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-145 and Samsung DV150F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-145 Gallery and Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Samsung DV150F
| VG-145 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus VG-145
| DV150F | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | July 2011 | More recent by 17 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung DV150F
| VG-145 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-145 offers outside measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung DV150F has dimensions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung DV150F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the VG-145 vs the DV150F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VG-145 and DV150F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-145 and DV150F.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung DV150F to offer you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older VG-145 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Olympus VG-145 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-145 | Samsung DV150F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-27 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $150 |