Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Launched December 2012
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is relatively comparable but the VG-145 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") use totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VG-145 was announced 17 months before the EX2F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the VG-145 grades versus the EX2F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-145 & Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Samsung EX2F
VG-145 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus VG-145
EX2F | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | July 2011 | More modern by 17 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung EX2F
VG-145 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-145 features exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has proportions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the VG-145 and the EX2F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-145 and EX2F is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-145 and EX2F.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VG-145 using its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Olympus VG-145 will provide more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged VG-145 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VG-145 | Samsung EX2F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-07-27 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lb) | 294 grams (0.65 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $478 |