Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung HZ35W
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung HZ35W, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-145 was manufactured 14 months after the HZ35W making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the VG-145 matches up against the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-145 and Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-145 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Samsung HZ35W
VG-145 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | June 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus VG-145
HZ35W | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung HZ35W
VG-145 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-145 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the VG-145 compared to the HZ35W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-145 and HZ35W is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The picture underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-145 and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-145 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern VG-145 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VG-145 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also Known as | - | WB650 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 120g (0.26 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $300 |