Clicky

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Olympus VG-145 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Olympus VG-145
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Announced July 2011
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus VG-145 versus Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The VG-145 was announced 7 months later than the ST65 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the VG-145 matches up against the ST65 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Samsung ST65

 VG-145 ST65 
ReleasedJuly 2011January 2011Fresher by 7 months

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Olympus VG-145

 ST65 VG-145 
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung ST65

 VG-145 ST65 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-145 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VG-145 versus Samsung ST65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the VG-145 vs the ST65.

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-145 and ST65 is 96 and 99 respectively.

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The photograph below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-145 and ST65.

All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels and you should expect similar quality of pictures but you should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The younger VG-145 provides an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Portrait photography information
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography information
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VG-145
Street photography with Samsung ST65
48
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
49
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
max ISO too low (0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VG-145
Sports photography with Samsung ST65
26
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery (160 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
26
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Travel photography info
Samsung ST65 Travel photography info
62
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
bad battery (160 shots)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
71
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-145 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Landscape photography camera
36
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
bad battery (160 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse function
37
great maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-145 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST65 as a Vlogging camera
28
reasonably wide (26mm)
includes face detect focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic port
27
great maximum aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-145 and Samsung ST65
 Olympus VG-145Samsung ST65
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus VG-145 Samsung ST65
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2011-07-27 2011-01-19
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 80 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.40 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 120 grams (0.26 pounds) -
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 160 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC -
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $0 $130