Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VG-145 was brought out 17 months before the WB250F which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the VG-145 grades against the WB250F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-145 & Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Samsung WB250F
| VG-145 | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus VG-145
| WB250F | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung WB250F
| VG-145 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-145 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the VG-145 versus the WB250F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-145 and WB250F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-145 and WB250F.
Plainly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of images however you really should consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged VG-145 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Olympus VG-145 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-145 | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-07-27 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $250 |