Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung WB800F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-145 was launched 17 months prior to the WB800F which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the VG-145 scores against the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-145 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-145 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Samsung WB800F
| VG-145 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus VG-145
| WB800F | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 17 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung WB800F
| VG-145 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-145 provides physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-145 compared to the WB800F.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-145 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The image here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-145 and WB800F.
To sum up, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VG-145 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus VG-145 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VG-145 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $300 |