Clicky

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Olympus VG-145 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus VG-145
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched July 2011
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the VG-145 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the VG-145 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The VG-145 was introduced 3 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the VG-145 grades against the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VG-145 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus VG-145

 DP2 Quattro VG-145 
LaunchedFebruary 2014July 2011Newer by 31 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VG-145 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-145 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has sizing of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check the Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the VG-145 and the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-145 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The pic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-145 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The VG-145 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged VG-145 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VG-145
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
77
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect focus
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-145 as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
48
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VG-145
Sports photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
26
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (160 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
47
megapixel count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Travel photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography details
62
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
bad battery (160 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
53
megapixel count decent (20MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-145 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
36
really wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
bad battery (160 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
59
has manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Vlogging details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging details
28
really wide (26mm)
offers face detect autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
9
no video
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus VG-145 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-145 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus VG-145Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus VG-145 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-07-27 2014-02-13
Physical type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.40 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 120 grams (0.26 pounds) 395 grams (0.87 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 160 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC -
Card slots One One
Launch price $0 $931