Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus VG-160 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The VG-160 was launched 11 months before the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the VG-160 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VG-160 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus VG-160
XZ-2 iHS | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VG-160 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-160 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the VG-160 against the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4fd5/c4fd5b12f283a93bf5bf1ba187ddee4d4c756b1c" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec388/ec388474e0436ca937388268120e5b0062967341" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The graphic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VG-160 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Olympus VG-160 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older VG-160 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab8c3/ab8c3e5a8ef8d142cd7b8e2ad28ef5d4668210c0" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22ad7/22ad7be190d318567b0375e2ea72abc64a87c936" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 pictures | 340 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $90 | $450 |