Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
95 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 155g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the FP3 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VG-160 was revealed 2 years after the FP3 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP3 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the VG-160 scores versus the FP3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Panasonic FP3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Panasonic FP3
| VG-160 | FP3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP3 over the Olympus VG-160
| FP3 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic FP3
| VG-160 | FP3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-160 has got physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Panasonic FP3 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-160 vs the FP3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and FP3 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and FP3.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of photos although you should always take the age of the products into consideration. The newer VG-160 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FP3 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 4.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $90 | $182 |