Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX75
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus VG-160 versus Panasonic FX75, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VG-160 was launched 20 months later than the FX75 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the VG-160 matches up versus the FX75 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Panasonic FX75
| VG-160 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | June 2010 | Fresher by 20 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus VG-160
| FX75 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic FX75
| VG-160 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 has got outside measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-160 versus Panasonic FX75 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-160 against the FX75.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and FX75 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and FX75.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs though you would want to take the release date of the products into consideration. The younger VG-160 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 165g (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $90 | $139 |