Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ2500
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32


53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Launched September 2016
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000

Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") feature different sensor dimensions.

The VG-160 was revealed 5 years before the FZ2500 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the VG-160 scores versus the FZ2500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Panasonic FZ2500
VG-160 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus VG-160
FZ2500 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 57 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic FZ2500
VG-160 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") and a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic FZ2500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the FZ2500.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and FZ2500 is 96 and 53 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and FZ2500.
All in all, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VG-160 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Panasonic FZ2500 will render more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-01-10 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 915 gr (2.02 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 shots | 350 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $90 | $998 |