Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus VG-160 versus Panasonic FZ35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VG-160 was released 19 months after the FZ35 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the VG-160 grades against the FZ35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Panasonic FZ35
| VG-160 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus VG-160
| FZ35 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic FZ35
| VG-160 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 offers external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has sizing of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") and a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Panasonic FZ35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the VG-160 and the FZ35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and FZ35 is 96 and 72 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The image here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and FZ35.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to show more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent VG-160 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 8.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 397 gr (0.88 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $90 | $999 |