Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
72 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus VG-160 versus Panasonic FZ35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-160 was released 19 months after the FZ35 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the VG-160 grades against the FZ35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Panasonic FZ35
| VG-160 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus VG-160
| FZ35 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic FZ35
| VG-160 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 offers external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has sizing of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") and a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Panasonic FZ35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the VG-160 and the FZ35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and FZ35 is 96 and 72 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The image here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and FZ35.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to show more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent VG-160 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 8.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 397 gr (0.88 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $90 | $999 |