Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0833/a08335c26f08b535a9a898d28dd2465dde9c64ab" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 front"
70 Imaging
51 Features
65 Overall
56
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 442g - 124 x 90 x 76mm
- Released March 2011
- Previous Model is Panasonic GH1
- Refreshed by Panasonic GH3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic GH2, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the GH2 (16MP) is relatively similar but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and GH2 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The VG-160 was manufactured 10 months after the GH2 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GH2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the VG-160 grades vs the GH2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Panasonic GH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Panasonic GH2
VG-160 | GH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | March 2011 | Newer by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH2 over the Olympus VG-160
GH2 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic GH2
VG-160 | GH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 provides physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GH2 has dimensions of 124mm x 90mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 442 grams (0.97 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic GH2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the VG-160 against the GH2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b6b5/1b6b58faa5d7a2eff14e47f5edc93967ec51d6df" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and GH2 is 96 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42b2/f42b2a91f541710b1056a02fe32e5809b4bd5a2d" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The picture here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and GH2.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The VG-160 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic GH2 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent VG-160 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e1fc/8e1fc9358ca38ac6e69dc636722d04c3dff6927e" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6490c/6490c8fb44045eadeebfa1b912515fdc50988daf" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic GH2 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-01-10 | 2011-03-23 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 15.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (24, 30, 60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 442 grams (0.97 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 90 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 60 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 655 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $90 | $1,000 |