Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS35
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS40
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Panasonic ZS35, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is very similar and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-160 was released 24 months prior to the ZS35 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the VG-160 grades against the ZS35 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Panasonic ZS35
VG-160 | ZS35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus VG-160
ZS35 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | January 2012 | Fresher by 24 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic ZS35
VG-160 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 has got exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-160 versus Panasonic ZS35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the VG-160 vs the ZS35.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and ZS35 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The photograph here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and ZS35.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Panasonic ZS35 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The older VG-160 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $90 | $300 |