Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a6f8/2a6f88512475e5fddf18d30bed4e5cef64abde04" alt="Pentax K-3 front Pentax K-3 front"
59 Imaging
65 Features
85 Overall
73
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 131 x 100 x 77mm
- Introduced April 2014
- Newer Model is Pentax K-3 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus VG-160 versus Pentax K-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and K-3 (24MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and K-3 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The VG-160 was manufactured 3 years prior to the K-3 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the VG-160 matches up versus the K-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 and Pentax K-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Pentax K-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Pentax K-3
VG-160 | K-3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-3 over the Olympus VG-160
K-3 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 27 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Pentax K-3
VG-160 | K-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Pentax K-3 has dimensions of 131mm x 100mm x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-160 versus Pentax K-3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the K-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a585/2a5854569bb3e1aa7ff0b62e8780af268216fec2" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and K-3 is 96 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6627/d6627a172377f534d94ae51a99b3ff13b85d5149" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The visual here might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and K-3.
Plainly, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VG-160 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Pentax K-3 will produce extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older VG-160 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18764/1876412854adfa50c8f36afc7a4b0997c448c57f" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eb9b/2eb9bbd851d44a6e8257ef7fe3eb6b85c555fe8d" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax K-3 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Pentax K-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Pentax K-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Prime III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6016 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 27 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, on, off, red-eye, slow sync, slow sync + red-eye, trailing curtain sync, high speed, wireless, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 131 x 100 x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 images | 560 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | Dual |
Pricing at release | $90 | $639 |