Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2013
- Replaced the Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the Q7 (12MP) is relatively close but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and Q7 (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The VG-160 was brought out 19 months before the Q7 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the VG-160 matches up versus the Q7 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 and Pentax Q7. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Pentax Q7
VG-160 | Q7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus VG-160
Q7 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 19 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Pentax Q7
VG-160 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Pentax Q7 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the VG-160 vs the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59cb/e59cb3063c8c406c6093eb1110a39b829578876f" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and Q7 is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c69/86c694831d2d7f8e8c0e197658027fa268d6c0c9" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The image below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and Q7.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VG-160 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus VG-160 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58aad/58aad49edd94aa286ef71a375aa2c6675a7a6f6d" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/894ef/894ef18acff45321454d754caa1eb03f10d98c49" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Pentax Q7 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 200 gr (0.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 shots | 250 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $90 | $480 |