Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus VG-160 and Pentax WG-3 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WG-3 GPS (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VG-160 was launched 18 months prior to the WG-3 GPS which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the VG-160 matches up against the WG-3 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| VG-160 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus VG-160
| WG-3 GPS | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| VG-160 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 has got external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-160 and Pentax WG-3 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the VG-160 and the WG-3 GPS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and WG-3 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and WG-3 GPS.
Plainly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older VG-160 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 238g (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $90 | $350 |