Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax X70
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
71 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax X70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 410g - 110 x 83 x 90mm
- Announced March 2009
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax X70 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus VG-160 versus Pentax X70, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the X70 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VG-160 was brought out 2 years later than the X70 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Pentax X70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the VG-160 scores against the X70 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax X70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 and Pentax X70. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Pentax X70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Pentax X70
VG-160 | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | March 2009 | More recent by 35 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax X70 over the Olympus VG-160
X70 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Pentax X70
VG-160 | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax X70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Pentax X70 has specifications of 110mm x 83mm x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-160 versus Pentax X70 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the VG-160 and the X70.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and X70 is 96 and 71 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax X70 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and X70.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus VG-160 to produce extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger VG-160 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax X70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax X70 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Pentax X70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus VG-160 | Pentax X70 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-01-10 | 2009-03-02 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 9.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 410 grams (0.90 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 110 x 83 x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $90 | $200 |