Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX2
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh CX2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-160 was released 2 years later than the CX2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the VG-160 matches up against the CX2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh CX2
| VG-160 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus VG-160
| CX2 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh CX2
| VG-160 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 offers external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh CX2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the VG-160 vs the CX2.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and CX2 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The visual here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and CX2.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher VG-160 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 185 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $90 | $341 |