Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
![Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VG-160/Olympus-VG-160-front.jpg)
![Ricoh G700SE front Ricoh G700SE front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-G700SE/Ricoh-G700SE-front.jpg)
88 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Introduced October 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh G700SE, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the G700SE (12MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The VG-160 was unveiled 16 months later than the G700SE making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the VG-160 grades vs the G700SE for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh G700SE. The full galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Ricoh G700SE Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh G700SE
VG-160 | G700SE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | October 2010 | Fresher by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G700SE over the Olympus VG-160
G700SE | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh G700SE
VG-160 | G700SE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 comes with exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G700SE has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh G700SE in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the VG-160 versus the G700SE.
![Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VG-160-vs-Ricoh-G700SE-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and G700SE is 96 and 88 respectively.
![Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VG-160-vs-Ricoh-G700SE-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and G700SE.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to give you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer VG-160 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
![Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-VG-160-vs-Ricoh-G700SE-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VG-160-vs-Ricoh-G700SE-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G700SE Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh G700SE | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh G700SE |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-10-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 307g (0.68 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | DB-60 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $90 | $0 |