Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G900
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh G900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and G900 (20MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VG-160 was manufactured 7 years before the G900 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the VG-160 matches up versus the G900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 & Ricoh G900. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh G900
| VG-160 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus VG-160
| G900 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 74 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh G900
| VG-160 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 offers external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh G900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the VG-160 and the G900.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and G900 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and G900.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh G900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $90 | $752 |
