Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2012
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Introduced April 2013
  • New Model is Ricoh GR II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Overview

In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh GR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is fairly similar but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The VG-160 was revealed 15 months earlier than the GR making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the VG-160 grades vs the GR for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh GR

 VG-160 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus VG-160

 GR VG-160 
IntroducedApril 2013January 2012More modern by 15 months
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GR

 VG-160 GR 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has sizing of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the VG-160 versus the GR.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and GR is 96 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and GR.

As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VG-160 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GR will offer you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Portrait photography highlights
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
74
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Street photography info
Ricoh GR Street photography info
56
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than average in class (245g)
great ISO range (25,600)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VG-160
Sports photography with Ricoh GR
26
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery power (165 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
45
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
low fps (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Travel photography camera
65
lighter than average in class (125g)
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse function
low battery power (165 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
71
lighter than average in class (245g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Landscape photography camera
36
really wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low battery power (165 shots)
missing Time Lapse function
61
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3")
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Vlogging information
Ricoh GR Vlogging information
30
really wide (26mm)
offers face detection focus
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic jack
30
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
no external microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GR
 Olympus VG-160Ricoh GR
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VG-160 Ricoh GR
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2012-01-10 2013-04-17
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.8
Macro focus range 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT Color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 300 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.80 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125g (0.28 pounds) 245g (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 78
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.5
DXO Low light score not tested 972
Other
Battery life 165 shots 290 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-70B DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $90 $971