Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-160 was unveiled 4 months later than the GR Digital IV and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the VG-160 grades vs the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| VG-160 | GR Digital IV |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus VG-160
| GR Digital IV | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
| VG-160 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | September 2011 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the GR Digital IV.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and GR Digital IV.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VG-160 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus VG-160 will give more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2011-09-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photographs | 390 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $90 | $599 |