Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is very comparable but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The VG-160 was manufactured within a month of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the VG-160 grades against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 VG-160 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus VG-160

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 VG-160 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 VG-160 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
RevealedJanuary 2012February 2012Same generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 comes with external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has specifications of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the VG-160 against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 96 and 69 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The VG-160 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will show more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography information
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography information
33
megapixel count good (14MP)
has face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
74
has manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Street photography camera
56
lighter than average (125g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
55
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than average in class (550 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography highlights
26
megapixel count good (14MP)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (165 shots)
has no phase detect AF
48
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VG-160
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
65
lighter than average (125g)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse mode
terrible battery power (165 CIPA)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
59
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
heavier than average in class (550g)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography factors
36
relatively wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
terrible battery power (165 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
63
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging factors
30
relatively wide (26mm)
has face detect focusing
lighter than average (125 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
24
pretty wide (24mm)
includes face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic socket
heavier than average in class (550g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Olympus VG-160Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VG-160 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2012-01-10 2012-02-02
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 7cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.80 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 grams (0.28 pounds) 550 grams (1.21 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 pictures 400 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-70B DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $90 $871