Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
85 Imaging
33 Features
44 Overall
37
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VG-160 was revealed 23 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the VG-160 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| VG-160 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | March 2010 | Newer by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus VG-160
| GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| VG-160 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the VG-160 compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 96 and 85 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The pic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VG-160 using its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus VG-160 will show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger VG-160 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-03-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 4.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 shots | 410 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $90 | $349 |