Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-160 was released 3 years prior to the WG-4 GPS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the VG-160 grades versus the WG-4 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| VG-160 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus VG-160
| WG-4 GPS | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| VG-160 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 has outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and WG-4 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and WG-4 GPS.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $90 | $210 |