Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The VG-160 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the VG-160 scores vs the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh WG-50
VG-160 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus VG-160
WG-50 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 65 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-50
VG-160 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-160 features outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the VG-160 against the WG-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5896a/5896a7c461e1cd6b69f3dbd2d3de67d46225cc8d" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6123/c6123921601b5c33c33d5e8286000cbfed792e93" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and WG-50.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba5fd/ba5fddabbcd583b0d79a89a01bf4691046fb6acf" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df3b2/df3b2d76a60413690cb5dd7cdb1b015eed6b4808" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $90 | $280 |