Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-80
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh WG-80, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VG-160 was brought out 11 years prior to the WG-80 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the VG-160 grades vs the WG-80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh WG-80
| VG-160 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus VG-160
| WG-80 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 126 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-80
| VG-160 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 comes with outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh WG-80 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-160 vs the WG-80.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and WG-80 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and WG-80.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to provide you with more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older VG-160 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $90 | $300 |