Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VG-160 was released 3 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the VG-160 grades vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| VG-160 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus VG-160
| WG-M1 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 32 months |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-M1
| VG-160 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-160 and the WG-M1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and WG-M1.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos though you really should take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged VG-160 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $90 | $2,000 |